writing-pass gives AI writing feedback by connecting your response, the exam task, and the scoring criteria in one report. You see a practice estimate, review highlighted evidence inside your text, and leave with a short list of changes to work on next.
The score shown in the demo is a practice estimate and may differ from an official exam result.
The demo uses the same report structure students see after submitting a writing sample: prompt, annotated essay, scoring criteria, practice estimate and next actions.
Start with the exam you are preparing for. writing-pass uses the selected task type to keep the feedback focused on the right criteria, not just general grammar.
IELTS and Goethe feedback should stay separate because their scoring systems are different.
Paste the task and your answer, or write directly in the workspace. The prompt gives the report the context it needs to judge relevance, coverage, structure, and language.
The more complete the task context, the more useful the feedback becomes.
The report gives you a practical score estimate, a CEFR label where relevant, and a short summary of what most affected the result.
This estimate is for practice. It is not an official IELTS or Goethe result.
Highlighted phrases show where the feedback comes from. Open a note to see the correction, the reason it matters, and a focused way to fix it.
Filter the report by errors, vocabulary suggestions, or high-impact issues.
The improvement plan turns the report into priorities. You see what is already working, what is holding the score back, and which change to practise first.
Start with the issues marked high impact before polishing smaller mistakes.
Each block below pairs the explanation from the product plan with the matching part of the demo report, so the workflow stays concrete: response, evidence, criteria and practice.
Prompt
In the future all cars, buses and truck will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Essay review
The world is changing rapidly, this includes the transportation system in various cities. In the soon future, the need for drivers to drive vehicles, will be something from the past. Driveerless system will be considered, and will replace the classic way of traveling. This altration may have some benefitis and drawbacks, which will be discussed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with the advantages of shifting to driverless vehicles, it is obvious, that traffic in urban areas will significantly reduced. This will be achieved, due to the fact that these machines are provided by artificial intelligence, capable of determining booth the speed and the distance of the trip. In addition, travelling will be definitely safer, since it will eliminate the factor of human errors on highways. Also, this step canavoid terrified accidents caused by unconscious drivers, driving under high alcohol consumption.
However, this develop in transportation system may have some disadvantages, including the loss of job opportunities in this feild. This replacement will lead to a situation which is hard on truck and buses drivers, who will be no longer needed for their services. Also. some individuals who consider driving as a method of entertaining, will be negatvely impacted. Such a change will kill their passion in driving
In conclusion, I argue that the benefits of shifting to a driverless vehicles outweigh its drawbacks, as safe roads is a priority for any city in the world.
Band & CEFR
Band 5.0
CEFR B1 · HighAssessment summary
The essay addresses the prompt and presents a clear position, but suffers from frequent grammatical errors, awkward collocations, spelling mistakes, and punctuation issues like comma splices. While the structure is clear with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, the lack of accurate sentence boundaries and restricted lexical range limit the score to 5.0.
All parts of the prompt are addressed with a clear position, satisfying Band 6 requirements for Task Response, though support remains relatively basic.
The essay presents information with some organization, but cohesion is mechanical and punctuation errors at sentence boundaries prevent a higher band.
Lexical resource is limited by noticeable spelling errors and unnatural collocations, placing the response firmly in the Band 5 range.
Grammatical control is weak, with frequent errors in punctuation and basic sentence structure that reduce readability.
The task gives the report the context for relevance, coverage, and structure. Without it, feedback can find language issues but cannot honestly judge whether the response answers the task.
See a practice estimate for the response, plus a confidence label that shows how certain the analysis is. It is useful for planning practice, not as an official result.
Start with the short version: what worked, what lowered the estimate, and what to fix before the next attempt.
Open each criterion to see the score, the strengths, the weaknesses, and the reason behind the estimate.
Keep the parts that already support your score, such as clear paragraphing, relevant examples, or accurate topic vocabulary.
See what is holding the response back, with the reason each issue matters for the selected exam task.
Read why this criterion received its estimate, based on the response and the selected task.
Review the response with highlighted notes. Each mark points to the exact phrase that triggered the feedback.
Filter the notes when you want to focus on one type of feedback at a time.
Open a highlighted phrase to see what to change and why it matters.
See the phrase, the correction, and the learning focus behind each issue. Minor mechanics and major issues are kept separate.
Improve word choice with clearer, more natural alternatives where they actually fit the sentence.
Find repeated issues, how often they appear, and the practice focus that will help you reduce them.
Check word count, paragraph count, issue totals, top error pattern, and confidence in one place.
Turn the report into the next practice step, with priorities based on what is most likely to affect the estimate.
Missing requirements show what the next level needs from your response.
Start with the changes that can make the biggest difference to your next response.
Keep what works. Fix what limits the estimate.
Confidence helps you understand how certain the practice estimate is. It is not a guarantee of an official score.
Use the features page as a hub, then open IELTS, Goethe or annotated examples when you need exam-specific criteria.
The feature workflow stays the same, but exam pages keep IELTS Writing feedback, Goethe Schreiben feedback and annotated writing examples in their own context.
We use optional cookies to understand how our website is used and improve our service.
Privacy Policy